Plebgraph · Digital lending · 2024

Reducing friction in a digital lending journey.

I led a six-person design team across the complete lending experience—simplifying document-heavy KYC, improving repayment discovery and creating a shared system for consistent delivery.

OrganizationPurple Bridge Innovations
RoleLead UI/UX Designer
Team6 design team members
Validation≈40 internal participants
OutcomeDeveloped and released

01 · Context

A fast loan journey still needs clarity and trust.

Plebgraph needed an end-to-end mobile experience that could take borrowers from registration and eligibility through KYC, application, disbursement and repayment.

Digital lending asks users to share sensitive identity and financial information before they receive value. Speed was important, but reducing steps alone was not enough: borrowers also needed to understand what information was required, why it was needed and what to do next.

The design challenge was therefore broader than creating screens. We needed to make a regulated, multi-stage journey feel manageable while keeping product, engineering and QA aligned across a large design scope.

02 · My role

Hands-on design leadership across the full product.

I worked with the Project Manager to translate business and functional requirements into flows, while coordinating a six-person design team from exploration through implementation support.

01

Problem framing

Gathered requirements from the PM, conducted secondary research and converted inputs into design problems and journey priorities.

02

Solution direction

Facilitated brainstorming and design discussions, shaped critical flows and coordinated feasibility conversations with development.

03

Team leadership

Allocated tasks, reviewed work, provided feedback and approved final design output across all major flows.

04

Delivery support

Maintained design-system consistency and worked with developers and QA as the implemented product progressed.

03 · Product journey

One connected experience—from intent to repayment.

I remained involved across the full journey, personally shaping critical decisions and reviewing the team’s work for consistency.

01Register and check eligibility
02Complete identity and financial verification
03Review offer, apply and receive funds
04Manage loan and make repayments

04 · Product decision

Reducing manual effort without creating a new dead end.

01
KYC completion

DigiLocker with a manual-upload fallback

Observed risk

Borrowers initially had to locate and upload multiple documents manually. The long, tiring process created a clear abandonment risk.

Decision

We proposed retrieving verified documents through DigiLocker and discussed technical feasibility with the development team.

Trade-off

DigiLocker reduced effort, but could not become the only route. Manual upload remained available as a fallback.

Initial path
  1. Find documents
  2. Capture or scan
  3. Upload individually
  4. Resolve upload errors
Improved path
  1. Authenticate with DigiLocker
  2. Select verified documents
  3. Review retrieved details
  4. Continue KYC
Fallback principle: convenience should shorten the journey, not make the product dependent on one external service.

05 · Usability decision

The homepage needed to serve existing borrowers too.

02
Repayment discovery

Moving a critical action out of hidden navigation

Testing signal

Participants became lost during repayment because the section was placed inside the hamburger menu.

Underlying issue

The homepage mainly promoted “Get Loan Now,” prioritising acquisition even when an active borrower needed servicing.

Implemented response

We added a direct repayment entry point on the homepage, reducing dependence on secondary navigation.

Before borrowingAcquisition priority

Eligibility and loan application remain the primary actions.

Active loanServicing priority

Loan status and repayment become visible, immediate actions.

06 · Team leadership

Consistency came from a working system, not final-stage policing.

Six designers were contributing to interconnected flows. The operating model needed to make decisions and reusable patterns visible to everyone.

Shared design system

Reusable components and agreed visual patterns were created early and shared across the team.

Continuous updates

When a component or pattern changed after discussion, the shared system was updated for subsequent work.

Daily 10-minute sync

A short daily forum surfaced blockers, reviewed challenges and aligned the team on possible solutions.

07 · Validation

Testing before and during development.

Before development

The Figma prototype was reviewed internally with approximately 40 participants to identify unclear steps, navigation problems and usability friction before engineering investment.

During development

The QA team tested the implemented product as development progressed, surfacing functional and interaction issues for resolution.

Research boundary: discovery relied mainly on secondary research and PM-supplied requirements. Internal prototype validation was useful for finding usability problems, but it is not presented as external borrower research.

08 · Visual design

A consistent interface across the lending lifecycle.

Selected screens from the original 2024 project show how the experience connected onboarding, KYC, personal and bank information, loan offers, repayment details and support within one shared visual system.

Eight Plebgraph mobile app screens covering the homepage, account menu, personal details, loan offer, KYC documents, loan details, bank information and FAQs
Selected Plebgraph mobile screens designed as part of the 2024 digital-lending experience.
View the original Behance case study ↗

09 · Outcome

From prototype decisions to a released lending product.

The designed experience moved through development and QA and was released publicly on Google Play. Later versions may differ from the 2024 interface shown in the original case presentation.

The lasting lesson was that product leadership happens at three levels simultaneously: improving the customer journey, aligning technical feasibility and giving the design team a shared system for making consistent decisions.